Written on 8 May 2014
In my previous article I hinted at the role of European Union foreign policy in the creation of the crisis in Ukraine. I will now focus on how the EU’s aggressive foreign policy is mirrored by its erosion of democratic structures and its crackdown on dissent in its domestic policy making.
Under Democratic Peace Theory it is postulated that democracies do not wage war on each other. The EU, as indicated by its institutional structures and its lack of tolerance for political dissent, cannot be regarded as a democracy. Merely having something referred to as a “parliament” is not sufficient for a political entity to be a democracy.
In some ways the European Parliament is similar to the State Duma of Imperial Russia under Tsar Nicolas II which existed but had no real power. Imperial Russia was never a democracy just as the European Union has never been a democracy. The fact that many of the powers of EU states have been transferred to the non-democratic European Commission mean that those individual member states also can no longer be regarded as genuine democracies. According to Democratic Peace Theory this bodes ill for international peace.
I just read an article at Breitbart.com entitled “The European Commission is pumping propaganda money into Britain, trying to interfere in the elections to the European Parliament” that shows how democracy within the European Union has been and continues to be subverted. This development arises from the fundamentally anti-democratic structure of the EU itself. If this article is correct then state resources are being actively employed to subvert the democratic process in order to control the outcome of an election.
The dirty tricks or “active measures” against political opponents of the EU regime are not restricted to UKIP. On 26 April 2014 another candidate for the European elections, Liberty GB leader Paul Weston, was arrested because he quoted Winston Churchill in a speech. Prior to this the Liberty GB radio host Tim Burton was taken to court in what appears to be an act of vexatious litigation. After the expense and inconvenience of going to court he was acquitted. The pattern is clear, it is only opponents of the EU who are arrested and exposed to what amounts to judicial intimidation.
These episodes of political repression illustrate clearly the direction in which the EU is going. The claimed motive for such repression may be regarded as necessary by many, but never-the-less the impact on democracy is dire. The way a state treats its own citizens is a window through which to see how it is likely to behave with its neighbours. Repressive regimes are more likely to have aggressive foreign policies because a population’s natural inclination for peace is more likely to be supressed by those who hold power.
This perhaps explains recent EU policy with regard to Ukraine. The people of Europe have no interest in the situation in Ukraine, but EU leaders do. The people of Europe have not real power to stop them from the dangerous course that they have chosen to take. The anti-democratic basis of the EU makes a major new war in Europe more likely! Far from blaming Vladimir Putin for the crisis, blame – if any is to be applied, could more likely be laid at the door of the commissars, apparatchiks, and enforcers of the EU.