The following is a video I found online about the village where I was born and grew up. It depicts the village the year before I was born. It is quite nostalgic for those who grew up in Walton in the 1970s.
Back in 2013 I posted about some letters that Sir Levett Hanson, of Normanton, wrote to his cousin, Thomas Leake – also of Normaton in West Yorkshire. I posted under the heading “The ‘Sir’ Levett Hanson Letters – Part of the History of Normanton, West Yorkshire“. Back then I only included the first letter. I have now found the file with my transcribed notes of the full series. I post hear to make them all publicly accessible just in case they are of interest to any local historians.
Also posted at: Wakefield Vistas
Copenhagen November 27th 1804
Your letter gave me great satisfaction. Had I not been favoured with yours, I meant to write to you. I do not doubt you and your family have lost two good friends by the death of Mrs Elizabeth and Mrs Catherina Hanson. However, [if] you and your family conduct yourself properly and [you] remain an honest respectable character, you will always find me to be a sincere and good friend. I have already said as much in my letters to Mr Brooke. Whenever you have the misfortune to lose your mother, I have told Mr Brooke that you will continue to live in the house and have the orchard, both rent free, and in case of sickness or misfortune I have desired him never to let you, your family [or] your mother want for anything.
I can never forget that you are my nearest of kin on the Levett side, and, though fortune was not favourable to your father and grandfather, I beg you never forget that on the side of the Leakes and the Levetts you are as old [and] good a family as most in Yorkshire and as many in England. The past Lord Scarsdale was a Leake, and always acknowledged your grandfather as a kinsman, although he could not come in for the Estate and Title.
The Smiths, the Torres and the Favells are [Fiz Gigges], as the late Robert Holdsworth called them in comparison with you, like father like sons. I suppose the Baronet of Newland or the Squires of Normanton and Snydale are not a bit better than their fathers, where you do not posses the estate and fortune, these people do. But that is nothing, remember manners maketh man, and an honest man is God’s masterpiece.
When I tell you never to do anything unworthy of your name and character, and [to] never forget whence you are sprung, I do so to [excite] you and yours to live [as] honest decent people and not to make you foolish, vain and proud, which behaviour is improper even in those who are rich and really great.
I have known you these one and thirty years, I think you must be about four and forty. How many children have you in all and how many lads and lasses, as we say in Yorkshire? What is the name of your [mother’s] aunt at Wakefield and is she living, she used to be my snuff merchant. As to your son, I wish he was eighteen or twenty instead of fifteen. I want a companion and not a servant. My manner of living would not suit a lad [of] fifteen, although it might a young man of one and twenty. I live much a[t] home and [am] very [retired] and do not like those who are with me to be running about. This is hard for a lad of your son’s time of life. Nevertheless, I do not give up the matter but he must wait [u]till I come to Hamburg. I would wish your son, in the meantime, to stick to county business and beg you to assure him [that] I shall not forget him nor his father neither. If you have lost two good friends in my aunts, you have found one in me. If I have never any reason to the contrary, I shall always look upon you and love you as my next of kin. Remember our Grandmothers were sisters.
As to the wood you wish to purchase, it is a matter upon which I do not pretend to determine anything. Mr Brooke has my power of selling it for me and if you and he can settle the business, I shall be satisfied. I have sent to him, by this post, that half of your letter which concerns this business and if you and he can agree, I think you ought to have the preference, but I must tell you once [and] for all, my good kinsman, that it is my firm and decided resolution never to take my business out of the hands of Mr Brooke, which I have [since] trusted to him, first of, all because he well deserves my [continued] and unlimited confidence by his past probity and attention for my interests, and secondly because, situated as I am and at so great a distance, Mr Brooke is far better able to judge of what is right and proper than I can possible [do].
When you talk of the ‘jungle’ near the house you live in, I suppose you mean the orchard. I beg you will take great care to keep up the hedges and fruit trees. Our Uncle, Mr Robert Levett, had made it, for its size, one of the best orchards in the parish. It is your duty and interest to preserve it in a good state and plant choice trees when necessary. I mention these things since you are old enough to pay due weight upon what I say.
I am glad to hear the [e]nclosure advances; certainly I would wish you to have a [close] for the convenience of you and your family and [Harpin’s Close], likewise, when he dies; but for these I expect a fair rent. All these are things you must talk over with Mr Brooke who, I am sure, wishes to befriend you.
As to the complaints you make that the wood for repairing the house and homestead was not given to you, I must tell you I do not think you have such a great reason to be satisfied. Mr Brooke agreed with the tenants Bailey about putting all the buildings in repair, and it was not extraordinary [that] Baily should wish to favour his brother-in-law. So close as a man’s [shirt] sits to his…you may be sure, I as your kinsman, ever wish to give you everything. But there is no rule with an exception, and on the outset of this rule [you] might to have made application to Mr Brooke, God knows, I never wish to take the meal of any man’s table, and least of all yours.
I heartily thank my cousin, your wife and your mother for all their kind remembrance of me and for their long and delightful assurance. My kindest remembrances and wishes to Matthew, who is one of the most honest and best of friends I ever met with. He has enjoyed my confidence for years and deservedly so. I don’t know anything his [quarters] with me as a friend.
But ‘tis all to no purpose, however, that will never prevent me from having more regard for him than for any other friend or acquaintance in this world and, am sure, his heart is the same towards me. Pray let me hear from you in answer to this and write to me often. Tell Matthew I have wrote at least two letters to him to which I have received no answer. I am very glad to hear he is well in health and spirits and I pray God you will continue so. Remember you are a relation which is more than friend or acquaintance. I must repeat it that I expect you will not fail to answer my letters regularly. Be kind and neighbourly too to Matthew, when it is in your power. I wish you all a merry Christmas and a happy New Year and remain with truest regards and friendships dear Thomas.
Your affectionate kinsman
- Your letter gave me great pleasure, when you write again speak to me as your near relation and make use of no ceremonies; common civility is all that is required between kinsfolk.
Copenhagen, March 22, 1805
You very justly begin your letter by calling me kind friend, which I really am. I can assure you, and to this [assurance] I will add that it is my intention to consider you and your family as the persons to whom I shall leave the landed property I have to dispose of. By this I mean what I [purchased] of[f] your late father and the farm at Whitwood, which is my property. These two farms I mean to leave upon you and yours and in such a [contingent] manner that you will not be able to sell.
As to the mood of my dear friend, I have long since told you my mind about it. The business was entirely entrusted to Mr Brooke, upon whom I depend. In [any] respect, he wrote me word that he has sold it for 375£ which is 25£ more than you offered, and consequently makes a notable difference. As such, you cannot blame him for his doing the best for my interest, nor me for reaping every possible advantage from the farms at Normanton and Snydale. I have, however, desired Mr Brooke to present you, in my name, with five guineas, and have requested him to give you as much more, when my mid-summer rents are paid. In this sum you see marked ten guineas, and this present I shall make you every year providing I have every reason to be satisfied with you.
A family of thirteen people, you and your wife and eleven children must ware out a good many pairs of shoes in a year besides food and raiment. However, as the proverb observes, when God gives mouths he sends wherewithal to fill them, and that by means of [your] honest industry and labours, joined to the assistance of your friends, will, I am sure, be your case.
Upon my friendship you may count most assuredly, I do not fail [to acknowledge] what you say about your eldest daughter and so soon as I am somewhat more settled you may depend upon my taking someone of your family to be with me. At any rate, it gives me infinite pleasure and satisfaction to find you and your family have so much confidence in me as not to make any difficulty about coming to live with me. You may always, in return, depend upon my sincere regards and affection.
You see[m], my dear kinsman, to have not quite clearly understood me as to what I said upon the subject of good character according to your situation in life. I never doubted that you have maintained one, that you exacted yourself to maintain it, and that you are well respected by your neighbours as any person in the Parish [aforementioned].
You see, I respect your own words and again, I repeat that I never doubted that the state of the case was as you represent it. What I meant, my dear Thomas, was to indicate to you that you [are] doubly obliged to pay attention to such points. First of all because it is your duty as a member of society and, accordingly, because you are descended from as good a family as any in the count[r]y. We are all under the distinct obligation of maintaining our character as men who form the community in general, and as men [who] all do nothing which can dishonour our forefathers. You see, I speak of those who are really well descended that circumstance will ever make a difference in civilised state. I well remember to have seen, in 1786, when I was last in Normanton and I then thought you a modest young man. I am sure that [in] time you are not altered.
As to your house and concerns, do not make yourself uneasy about them. I shall, this spring, give instruction to Mr Brooke to draw up my will, and, you may be assured, that Sir Thomas and Lady Cullum will never have the means of disposing of what is my own property. You and yours are my nearest of kin and are my heirs by adoption. Sir Thomas and Lady Cullum are t[w]o selfish interested people, they always have been and ever will remain. So, they may do what they will with the [entitled] estate, either now or when I am gone, but they never shall see a shilling of my money. I know them of old and I promise you, my good kinsman, you shall not be left to the mercy of Sir Thomas Cullum. I know the pride and naughtiness of his heart to which I was never a stranger. Never put your trust in any south of the Trent, especially Suffolk people. I thank you for your mentioning to me their intention of selling an estate enjoyed by the Levett family for many ages; but what is mine they shall not sell, I assure you. I am ashamed and blush for their behaviour to you about the [bedding], that after they had given it to you they sent for it back again, and left you only the bedsteads. But such measures on their part surprises not me, the one and thirty years they are married I have seen a hundred instances of it. Thus you see, I am well acquainted with them. Sir Thomas, as you observe, is a very ill tempered man, and my Lady, as a woman, is not a bit better.
I was much surprised to hear that your wife’s aunt, Mrs Brown, has been dead so long as 13 years ago. When I saw her in 1786, she certainly did not appear an old woman. I suppose you and your wife inherited her property.
You say when your mother has gone, you will have no one left on your other side. I thought you have [a hundred] cousins. Leakes and [Capers] at Horbury with whom, according to what I have heard of them, the less you have to do and the better you may always count upon my friendship, both you and your family.
I shall be very glad to see you when you can make it convenient to come and pass some time with me, and by so doing you will certainly be no loser.
Pray, who is the Mr Favell who married a daughter of Mr Torre? Is he son to Richard Favell, the surgeon, who lived at York, and grandson of old Mr John Favell of Normanton? Pray tell me when you next write.
I am very glad to hear my old worthy, honest, tried and good friend, Matthew [Hamilton], is well and intends writing to me. I shall always be willing to hear from him. If circumstances had allowed him, or rather allowed me to take him into my service in 1773, I should not have been so pressed upon as I have been, nor have met with the plagues and battles I have gone through. I know some people in Wakefield who were not his friends, whom I could mention, but I do not love to breed mischief. Enclosed, I send you a letter for Matthew, with kindest remembrance. You may tell him I always consider him as my oldest and dearest friend and so do whilst we remain in this world.
I learnt with much pleasure that all [were] well when last you wrote to me and [am] much obliged to my kinsman, your mother, for her hearty and dutiful wishes as to my health and happiness. I sincerely wish you all the same and request you to remain persuaded, my dear Thomas, that I am and ever shall remain your faithful and affectionate kinsman.
Hamburg, December 10th, 1805
You ought to begin your letter to me and conclude them as I do mine to you. Certainly it is that you cannot be ignorant of my regard for yourself in particular, nor of my good will towards your family in general.
I am very glad [that] my last letter gave you so much satisfaction. As to the one you wrote in answer, I never received it. Had you sent it under cover to Messrs [Hammersley] [& Co.], [Bankers], Pall Mall, London, I doubt not I should have received it. However, you must be more careful another time, since I expect some little attention from you.
I speak as from one relation to another, since you must know that I wish you and your family well and have already given proofs of the sincerity of my words and benevolence. I shall certainly not forget my relations at Normanton, upon whom fortune has not smiled, as upon those at Bury.
I shall be glad to see you next spring, providing the journey will not be too long and too expensive for you, and in case it will not occasion your being too long absent from your family, your business and your domestic affairs. You must weigh those considerations duly before you undertake the journey. You have a pretty long road from Normanton to Hull, and the voyage from thence to Hamburg is not indifferent to a landsman. However, there is time enough to think and make up one’s mind to these matters before the month of May, and when I know your intentions, I will inform you when your visit will be convenient.
It is with much satisfaction [that] I observe you are no more a friend to that [renegade], that [uncivilised] philistine Bonaparte than I am, and trust that providence will, sooner or later, put a stop to his career as well as it did to that of Turpin, [sixteen string] Jack and several others of the same class and description; in fact my good kinsman, our Yorkshire horse [was] [stolen] (aye), and the London highway m[e]n are honest gentlemen when compared to such a vagabond, to such a [ruffian], to such a merciless tyrant.
In case you do come next spring to Germany, and that, for the purpose of passing some time with me, I wish you could persuade my old true and tried friend Mathew [Hamilton] to accompany you. You tell me that he is very well and sends his love to me. Believe me my dear cousin, I have ever [treated] him as a brother since I was first acquainted with him. He is an honest, good-tempered man, and I wish when [he] left the service of Mr [Shawlenge] that he had applied to me to take him into mine. It would have been the saving of some hundreds to me. I have now known Matthew since July 1771 and have always entertained the same friendship for him. He is a person of much prudence and good sense and I shall ever love him as a friend so long as we continue on this world. I beg you will show him this letter. If he had accepted my proposals, he might have come and lived with me near 12 years ago.
It gives me great pleasure to learn you are satisfied and contented with the two small [enclosures] Mr Brooke has [assigned] you, and I rejoice much to hear that they will be so useful to you and your family. My attention and goodness towards you must convince you what a blessing and comfort it is to have good relations and kinsfolk and [ought] to induce you to have all possible kindness and proper treatment for your aged and respectable mother.
You will be pleased to observe that it is your mother, and not you, who has a life estate in the house and orchard once belonging to your father, and I must tell you that I do expect you will have all possible ease of your parent and never let her want for anything. Remember, you are a father yourself, and how would you, in your old days, like to be abandoned and ill treated by your children. A fault and a crime very common amongst the English, I remember to have observed repeatedly, but less in Yorkshire than elsewhere.
Mr Brooke, by assisting you, has [conferred] a favour upon myself and, as such I consider it. I repeatedly told him never to suffer you to want whatever is proper and reasonable, and observe with pleasure that you have returned what he was so kind to advance you. Indeed, I am well [appraised] that your good sense will always prevent you from making an improper use of his goodness, or from being troublesome to him [for] the present of ten guineas he will assuredly make you in my name so soon as the purchase money shall be made for the wood and agreed upon […].
I think you will consider me as your friend and kinsman. Believe me, I study to be so without pride or pretension. You have much obliged me, by what you say upon the subject of the allotments, I observe you have [sown] your [enclosures] accordingly to what you consider to be the most advantage to your family. Pray, is Mr Bailey, my Normanton tenant, one of the Baileys of ‘Lasco’ and is Miss Holdsworth still living.
I always supposed that the present Mr Favell is son of Richard Favell who lived at York and a grandson of the late Mr John Favell as he has now [united] all the concerns of that family he must have a good estate at Normanton, the greatest part of which was made out of the Levett estate by a foolish second marriage contracted by our great grand mother Levett with a forefather of Mr Favell. Pray, has not this Mr Favell married a daughter of Mr Torre of Snydale. How in the name of wonder, did that proud family consent to such a [match], and where is this cousin Favell of ours gone to live in the North Riding?
You are in the right to have nothing to do with your Horbury cousins, with the [Capers] in particular. What Leakes what [Capers], you must have a regiment by this time? I remember about 30 years ago to have seen one of your Uncle John Leake’s sons, who, my aunt told me was one of the best of the family. As to your aunt [Caper], she did all she could to play [tricks], expecting what was left to your father and me. She consulted old [Noyle], the attorney who lived, I believe, at [Ryekold] and endeavoured to do all possible mischief. As to those Horbury men, they never came to Normanton but for money.
And so, my dear Thomas, God be with you. My best wishes to your wife, your children and your mother. In a word, a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, and believe me, ever your affectionate kinsman and faithful friend.
Copenhagen, June 9, 1807
After a silence of near a year and a half you may be sure I was glad to hear from you, it is true the message of my writing to Mr Brook[e] provides you various and repeated occasions of hearing how I go on where I am, and what I am about. But the reasons you assign for not writing sooner are by no means valid. You have not the least occasion to lack of expense as to our correspondence, since I have, long ago, pointed out to you the mode of it being carried on without costing you a farthing. I have, I am sure, more than once told you that you could always forward your letters to me, under cover, to Messrs Hamersley, my bankers, who live in Pall Mall, London; and they will not fail of transmitting them to me. As to mine addressed to you, I always send them under cover to Mr Brooke. Of course they cost you nothing, your excuse, therefore, about the expense is at best a very lame one. It might have gone down some thirty years ago when you [were] Tommy Leake laking in the Town Gait or Church Yard at Normanton, but it won’t hold good [now] you are a man and the father of a family.
I was very glad to hear you are all well in health, especially your mother who is the only survivor of our old set of kinsfolk. Fail not to lack care of her and treat her with kindness. It is your duty so to do and an obligation where from nothing can unbind. You remember so long as she lives, she has a life estate in the house and orchard you occupy and you are her tenant.
I need not tell you how thankful you ought to be to providence for having prolonged the lives of your parents until you [were] creditably and comfortable settled. I had the misfortune to lose my mother before I was five or six and my father before I was eleven years old, and owing to those early loses I may well and truly ascribe almost every mishap that has befallen me.
Had my friend, Mr Matthew Hamilton, entered my service when he went to Mr Torres, the case would have been very different. He is a prudent, reasonable man and would have taken the best of care of everything connected with my interests.
You once talked of coming to see me last year. It was not quite convenient for me to receive your visit since my stay at Hamburg was very uncertain and it was equally so as to my returning to Copenhagen, which I consider as my home and favourite dwelling place. I wish when harvest time is over, that you would come and pass two or three months with me at Copenhagen. You must persuade Matthew Hamilton to accompany you. You can go from Wakefield to Hull and so take shipping from [Ellesmere], which is only twenty English miles from Copenhagen. There I will meet you and conduct you to this city, where you shall be treated as a dear kinsman and a good friend and Matthew like an old well beloved friend for whom I will always entertain and mention that regard and esteem which he so well deserves from me. Think upon this and let me see you both. I will pay all travelling expenses, as you deserve, my dear Thomas.
I have had a good deal of trouble to keep myself out of the reach of the French armies since the 23 October 1805. I have undertaken several long journeys for the purpose. Thank God I have succeeded so far and find myself very comfortable in Denmark.
It is my wish and hope, sooner or later, to be able to return to [???], the place of all others after [Madeira] which I, on all accounts and in all respects, ever found to be one of the most agreeable and desirable for a reasonable man to inhabit. It is a small city where I would rather live and die than any other.
I thank you much for your information respecting the manner in which our late cousin Holdsworth disposed of his estate and property. I am glad you came in for five pounds at least, he might as well have left you fifty. He was a singular, good-tempered man to leave his estate to a person who was no [sense] related to him.
Mr Holdsworth[‘s] grandfather, by his father’s side, married a Levett and your grandfather by his mother’s side married a Holdsworth; brother and sister married brother and sister. Insomuch as your father and Mr Holdsworth were second cousins, double blood, you and I and [all] the Leakes and Capers were as ourselves equally related to him as to my late aunts, Lady Cullum and myself. It is not to be wondered at that he left us nothing, since in 1766, Lady Cullum refused him for her husband and he always thought that my aunts and I had persuaded my sister not to marry him. I, for my own part, never expected a [sliver] from him.
I wish Mr [Mallory] much good look with [h]is fortune and long life and health to enjoy it. Pray, is he a clergyman or what is he and what sort of character does he bear? Does he live at ‘Lasco’ and, pray, what is the name of the present vicar of Normanton, and of the clergyman, who does duty there? Tell me also, what are become of the Middletons, old Robert’s sons? I remember William, Jack, Tom, Charles and Robert. Tell me, likewise, what are become of the Crawshaws? I once knew Jackey and Billy and Jassey. Jackey, I know, died long ago. What has become the two others? Old Maude, Mrs Buckle[‘s] uncle ruined that family. Did not the son of our cousin Richard Favell, the surgeon, marry a daughter of Mr Torre of Snydal?
I, for my part, should as soon have expected to hear that our King George had married one of his daughters with a court gentleman, as to have hear[d] that a young lady of the proud, stiff family Torre was married to a Favell. To what place in the North Riding [has] this Favell gone to live at? Answer me all these questions when church is over on a Sunday. You may as well sit down and write me a long letter as to walking about the fields or standing at the house steps near the churchyard gates, both which I well recall of used to be the chief Sunday morning amusement at Normanton in the spring, summer and autumn. Your church in an afternoon on Sunday used to be empty almost….
For one to comply therewith, you must observe, my good kinsman, that since the 23 October 1805 I have been compelled to expend at least £400 more than I should have done had I remained settled and quiet at Copenhagen. Add this to all the money I was under the necessity of paying away for Thomas Cullum and for other purposes after the death of my good aunt and all expenses and outgoings attending the enclosures of Normanton and Snydale and Whitwood, and you will perceive that it is totally out of my power. We, at present, live in precarious, uncertain and [feckless] times, [when] a man has not ready money at command he may find himself in a sudden put to a non plus.
Be assured, my kind dear kinsman, that I am very far indeed from being offended at your applying to me for the loan in question; on the contrary I am much pleased with your candour. I am confident that I am your [hearty] and sincere friend as well as an affectionate relation. You are already….of and grateful sentiments you express these upon and are most highly accepted to me. I am glad my friend Mathew was so well when last you wrote to me; enclosed is a letter you will deliver to him with my best assurance and kindest wishes. When you answer this, spare not your paper, tell me how old you are, how old my cousin, [how old is] your wife, how many children you have, how many boys how many girls, how old each is and what their Christian names are. I like to know such details and matters with particular exactness. I am glad to see you and I entertain the same opinion on Bonaparte; no two honest people can passionately form two different opinions respecting such a tyrannical [monster].
It will give me much pleasure to learn, and to have occasion to inform you than the French [have] been defeated, most completely, in Poland. It will, in like manner, give me much satisfaction to hear that you have happily as well founded expectation to be blessed with a fine summer such as fallen to our lot, and such as we expected in Denmark. You, as a farmer, must feel interested in such matters.
I was glad indeed to find [by your] last [letter], that you were all so well in health, which is the first and greatest blessing, such as been my state for many years past. I was never so well as throughout this winter at Copenhagen. Would the state of the times allow it, I think I should be as well able to undertake a journey on [foot] from here to Copenhagen as I did in 1802 from Hamburg to that city.
My kindest and best wishes to your wife, children and mother. Believing me, my dear Thomas, your faithful and affectionate kinsman.
Stockholm, June 23, 1808
You will have found the time long since you wrote to me, and that I have suffered you to remain so many months in that giving you an answer. But what between my own concerns and the particular duties of my office, my time has been so taken up that I have not had a spare moment to bestow upon you.
Moreover, the winter months in the country are extremely long and the days equally short. That season, in December, we must light our candles at four in the afternoon. But as a recompense for that inconvenience, in the month of May and the three following, we have no night and the sky, the heavens, are clear and as bright as they are in England at half past eight in the evening.
In addition to all these causes which have prevented me from writing to you, I must tell you likewise that from the first of November last until the beginning of May I was much enjoyed in company as the town was then full and we had many English, of good families, here at the time [of] our King’s birthday. They are [now], most of them, upon their travels throughout Sweden, and many are returned to England. The Swedish nobility and gentry [have] also gone into the country so that Stockholm is very empty at present.
I shall follow their example and go to some of our [Harrowgates] for two or three months by way of changing the air and living a little in the country. This causes, I say, my good kinsman, as well as the others above mentioned, prevented me from writing to you with my usual exactness.
However, our worthy friend, Mr Brooke will hear me witness that I have always remembered you in my letters to him with that affection so justly due to you as a near relation, and that esteem which belongs to you as a father of a large hopeful family and an industrious honest painstaking man.
I was glad to hear from you, last, that it left you all hearty and well, especially my good cousin, Mrs Leake your mother, who I rejoice much to find holds out so well. Forget not to make her old age easy and pleasant and comfortable, you cannot forget the commandment which orders you to obey your father and mother, and that commandment you must keep observed if you expect your children, in their time, shall love, honour and obey you. My kind respect and wishes to your mother, your wife and all your family. Continue, all of you, in the good way hitherto followed; steer, always, the same virtuous, honest course and you may rely upon, always, joining me, your affectionate kinsman and sincere friend.
I thank you for the information you gave me concerning the Crawshaws. That family was ruined by the too great indulgence of a foolish and [ever fond] mother, who suffered them, the three sons, Jackey, William and Jassey. I mean, to do as they pleased, and consequently, they run through everything in that business. They were a good deal assisted by a person who had a view to get hold their estate, in which point, if he did not himself, his family has completely succeeded.
Jackey served his clerkship with one who gave him more than the [length] of his feather, for his particular pen passes. I remember, his being in that situation and that very circumstance joined to their mother’s foolish fondness and indulgence, laid the foundation of their subsequent ruin. I[t] was foreseen and foretold long, long before it happened in 1768, now forty years ago.
I recollect having seen three brothers, of whom it might be said that neither the three [ridings] of our county, nor any three other countries could provide three taller made, handsome young men in one and the same family. But what is all this without prudence and good conduct? You see, it leads to nothing.
So William, John and Robert Middleton are all gone. In 1768 [and] 1770 when I was at Normanton to pass Whitsun Day holidays, we were all playfellows together, so were poor Billy Denton, Jassey Crawshaw, Tom Norton, Tom Priestley, Tommy Middleton and many others, when we used to play a hid and seek together. I have [carried] them all in turn, and so have they me. [Is dear] Thomas Middleton still alive, I can[‘t] well remember; assure him of my faithful remembrances and good wishes. I liked all the brothers: William, Thomas and Charles, but Thomas the most of them. We used to call him ‘the little fox’, he was so cunning in hiding himself, in catching others and escaping from being caught. If I know of anything that would give him pleasure as a recollection [of] his old play fellow, I should be glad to give it as a remembrance of old times. Endeavour to learn if half a dozen silver teaspoons, or such things, would be agreeable to him; pray do not fail to answer soon. You can always put letters under cover to Messrs Hamersley, my bankers, who will forward them to me and that will save you [the] expense of postage.
I send this, for the same reason, to Mr Brooke, to the end that it may cost you nothing. I hear all your children have been [inoculated]. Keep up to good old manners and customs, as our Uncle Levett did, and do not, either you or yours, run after expensive new fangled fashions. My most kind and friendly wishes to my old friend, Mathew Hamilton. Why does he never write to me? I have not heard from him these four years.
Pray, live neighbourly and upon good terms with him, and, if he ever be sick or unwell, let him want for nothing you and your family can do for him. I will not fail to make good to you any expense you may be at on my account, as above mentioned Matthew may be assured that I have the same friendship and regards for him as I had in 1771, 1772, 1773, when I saw him for the last time. Take care to show him all my letters, since there are no secrets and I wish him to read everything that relates to him.
As to myself, this leaves me tolerably well, but my health is not so good as when I was at Copenhagen. The air of Denmark is much wholesomer than that of Sweden, and the climate much better.
Adieu, dear cousin, and believe me, your sincere and faithful friend and most affectionate kinsman.
Copenhagen, July 29, 1812
Your letter of December last, without any precise date, reached me about the middle of January. You seem to mistake the matter concerning my motives upon the subject of your voyage and journey by sea and land to Sweden and Stockholm. I am far from thinking that your undertaking was either rash or improper.
What I [thought] and said, still do, and ever shall say, and, I think, was that you ought to have wrote to me and informed me of your intention in such a manner that I might have been appraised of it at least a month or six weeks before you arrived in Sweden, to the end that I might have taken [any] measures with my friend, Mr Smith, the English Minister, or consult rather at Gothenburg and with the gentleman messenger to the King our Sovereign, who when then, in waiting, whereby you might have been enabled to travel from Gothenburg to Stockholm with as much ease as from York to London, and instead of passing one month with me and my friends you could have easily and conveniently, to me, to yourself, to your affairs, and to your family at home, have remained three months in the capital of Sweden.
All this, is truth and fact, the consequence of your not having given me timely information of your coming. You are in some measure better acquainted with, than I am, you [got] [inkled] with, Captain Clark and [the] race of riffraff coasting masters of merchantmen who kept you in their hands as long as they could and transferred you from one to another as it suited their purpose.
These honest fellows found out that you was a landsman, who never travelled, and they were determined to ransom and fleece you out of as much as they could and, in short, to make a penny out of you. Thus, you [were] kept at sea upwards of six weeks, without been suffered to go on shore before you arrived at Stockholm, [and] exposed to all kinds of dangers. This circumstance, of course, delayed your arrival at Stockholm [and] shortened your stay. [These], very considerably threw you into the worst season for returning, made you wait a long time at Gothenburg in November [and] [retarded] your return to England.
Had you wrote to me, as I have already mentioned, in ten days could you have performed the voyage and journey from Hull to Stockholm. Since you told me that, in five days, you sailed from Hull to Gothenburg, and you know by experience that [these] days at the utmost, the King’s messenger were up and down to and from Gothenburg to Stockholm, so allowing you, in the season of the year when you put in at Gothenburg, two days to rest yourself [and] you might, as I have said, have come from Hull to Stockholm in ten days without the smallest difficulty; but no more on this subject.
I beg of you, had you not talked of your rash attempt, I should never have said a word more upon the subject, but you have forced me to do so because I think it necessary to represent to you, in the strongest and clearest terms, where you [were] blameable in that transaction.
You have certainly delayed writing to me as long as it was well possible for you to do. To tell you plainly my notions as to the point, I must [warn] that I am very seriously of [the] opinion, that had not Mr Brooke intimated to you that you [were] to give up the land you farmed from [me], you never would have given yourself the trouble of writing to me.
I am glad to find you have settled your creditors, but as to suffering the [Close] to remain in your hands, that I can never consent to. You own me [now][:] four years rent, which amounted to forty pounds, [and] your journey to Stockholm, [which] cost me thirty pounds more out of my pocket besides your expenses whilst with me, which one way or other made ten more. Here, then, is [four] [score] pounds, to which, if we add my annuity to your mother and my annual present to you, it will follow that since the beginning of October 1808 you received a full hundred pounds, which is much more than one third of my clear yearly income. This, therefore, is a running sore, which must be healed, and the sooner the better.
I quite agree with Mr Brooke, [that] in this business, [as] in all others which relate to my Yorkshire concerns, presuming upon the near relationship which subsists between us, upon my good easy temper, and upon my past kindness to you, you could have gone on, my good kinsman, without ever paying me a farthing. This, with regard to you, is somewhat of a family failing. Your late father, whom I well remember, was an acute, shrewd, [and] sensible man. But he always went upon crutches by depending more upon kinsfolk than upon his own toils or labours. This sort of conduct you must avoid, as much as possible.
I myself do not fail to [bestin] my [stumps] [as] to augment the [shot] in the [lacker]. In 1802 I printed a work, by which I am no [loser], and in the course of last year I prepared and printed another, whereby I have gained one hundred and twenty Guineas. It is true, my dear Thomas, well one may say that we cannot, all of us, be as you and I are, authors and carpenters. But those who are carpenters and authors [may] stick to their trade and calling and, as far as depends upon themselves, endeavour to extract all the profit they can from their individual and respective situations. This maxim must never be neglected.
What you have told me of [Askhan] does not much surprise me. He is a [thoroughly] hearty, good fellow and a true Englishman. You must no doubt still remember the very cheerful, rational, pleasant day we passed with him when we dined and [suppered] with him by his invitation at his lodgings. [Askhan] is generous, hospitable and honest; he is no enemy but his own. I wish him well in his new calling.
Mr [Ruhl] is much obliged to you for your kind and friendly remembrance of him. As well as myself, he was very glad to have passed the [means] of doing anything that was useful or agreeable to you and begs to present you his best wishes so far as relates to everything [concerning] the interest and [real] welfare of yourself and your family.
Mr Steward, our old friend and companion, is as we hear, [placed] as land steward in service of some nobleman. Since you left us in 1808, all the old set, which was so closely connected and held together for three years, nearly is dispersed in all quarters.
I am sorry that in your last [letter] you have not once mentioned my old friend Matthew Hamilton. If he is still living, tell him that I esteem and regard him as much as I did in 1771 and 1772 and shall continue to do so whilst breath remains in my body. I wish when he quitted Mr [Gream] in 1773, that he had been placed with me. He should have been, had I known everything then as well as I do now, and we, neither of us, should have been losers. But so it is in this world, and we must submit and bear patiently our disappointments.
So fare you well good cousin, may the Almighty bestow His blessings upon you and your family, and believe me to remain, most sincerely, your affectionate kinsman and friend.
No. 211 Westerwold Copenhagen
Wednesday April the seventh 1813
When you will receive this, my answers to your letter [dated] February the 19th, I know not circumstances as matters are at present. I do not recollect previously, the day when yours was delivered to me, but this I remember, namely, that it came very quickly, which indeed often happens with regard to the arrival of mails at Gothenburg, the only [cabal] whereby, at present, we can receive letters from England as far as the case requires it.
I beg you will accept my [consolatory] assurances of the interest I take in the loss you have experienced by the death of your only surviving parent. However, my cousin, your mother lived to a good old age, far exceeding the accustomed bounds of life, and which providence grants only to a few of its creatures that you feel as you ought to do.
The full weight of such a family misfortune is matter, Mr Thomas Leake, of the truth whereof I am well persuaded. You cannot but lament the death of the person to whom you [were] indebted for your birth, for the care of your infancy and the kind treatment which through yet a long life she never failed to exhibit towards you. However, as she in this world performed all her duties as a patient wife, a tender mother and a sincere good Christian all may steadfastly hope, therefore, that she will receive the reward of the past and enjoy the blessing of a happy eternity in the region where the afflicted find comfort and [the] faithful enjoy everlasting rest.
As you justly observe, the premises and the jungle, as you call it, can become part of my freehold property, but for all that I am much inclined to believe that, with the exception of my being no longer in a state of paying the annuity to my late cousin, I shall not, by this addition to my said property, become much richer.
In your present situation, it is natural for you to wish for comfort, and what I can, I will administer to you. Observe for the present, I shall not make you many great promises, not enter into any extensive engagement. All I shall say at this juncture, is that so long as you and your wife live, it is my intention that you shall enjoy the house and jungle, or orchard, rent free and as to what more I may do, that will depend upon your conduct.
Upon my friendship you may depend; I have never ceased giving you proofs of it, you cannot fail remembering how I received and treated you when you arrived at and remained in Stockholm, the expense attending your stay and the sum of money I advanced you when you left me, are evident and solid proof at my acting towards you as a relation and friend. I mention this to you not by way of boasting, nor of making you feel for the weight of the obligation, but for the sake of convincing you that the benevolence and generosity must be exercised with discretion as I have already observed to our mutual friend, Mr Brooke. The above named items and the sum you are still indebted towards me amount to more than one third of my clear income. In both your want of punctuality in paying your amount due to me fall heavily upon me when I was under the necessity of taking a long journey with Mr Ruhl and my housekeeper, the Christine you may remember to have seen at Master [Delquillion’s], from Stockholm to Gothenburg and from the latter named place to Copenhagen.
When I came here I had a small house to furnish, some outstanding old accounts to settle, which owing to the war, once subsisting between Denmark and Sweden, I had been prevented from doing sooner and then again in that year 1810, I was minus in my receipts an amount of the order to the tune of sixty eight guineas. Last year I had to settle with the family of my predecessor in office, which at one stroke swept two hundred and eighteen sterling pounds out of my strong box. Put all these items together and you will find that they form a heavy sum total, which prevents me from being over and above bountiful to either friends or kinsfolk.
This is a true statement of my affairs. I can assure you with respect to what you mention concerning the raising [of] my rents. I will candidly confess to you that what you have said to me upon the subject is, in fact, the first word I have heard about the matter. From Mr Brooke I have not received a line, no, not since last year. I think, however, that he might have mentioned to me your mother’s death, and have let me know his intentions as to increasing the rents paid by the tenants to the [sum] of Sir Edward Smith and Mr Favell augment their rentals. I think [that it] is but fair that I should follow their example in a just proportion in due time. I doubt not that I shall hear from Mr Brooke if he has not wrote ‘till now I [dare] answer for it that he has had good reason for remaining silent.
As you may well imagine, I was exceedingly glad to hear that my very old friend and dear and beloved friend, Matthew [Hamilton], is well. May [he] ever command from what is in my power to give him. Let the wind blow as it will with him, he may always count upon the half of my last guinea being at his service. I know no one living for whom I have so much esteem, so much friendship and so heavy an affection, and I beg that you will not only tell him so for me, but take care, likewise, that he reads this letter. Herewith are letters for him and Thomas Middleton. Matthew and I have been friends these two and forty years and Tommy and I were play fellows in 1768, that is to say five and forty years ago. I always had a great liking for all the Middleton family.
By this post I have wrote to Mr Brooke and have requested him to purchase half a dozen silver tea spoons and a pair of silver tea tongs, and to present them in my name to ‘little fox’ Thomas Middleton, who, like myself, is I suppose, now growing up as a fellow. You will give these letters to him with my best remembrances and kindest wishes, the same to my cousin, your wife, yourself and your family.
I was sincerely glad to learn that you and yours, as well as dear Matthew Thomas Middleton and William [Walker], were well, may the Almighty grant that you may continue.
So as I have for him, Mr Ruhl thanks you much for your friendly enquiries and good wishes, as he never was a friend by halves to any one. So [I] can assure you, he is a real and true friend to you, he is never prone to do the smallest enquiry in disservice to any one, and far from [invitations] [be] against you, he in all [ticklish] occasions as your warm [advocate] and never fails to plead your cause.
Thank God we are both in good health and are [enjoying] [even] [spirits] since my establishment at Copenhagen. We have lived pleasantly and agreeably, but not so gaily, nor amidst much jollity as when you was at Stockholm. This, however, is not to be wondered. At Sweden and Denmark are different countries and Sweden and Denmark are different people; the same principle is equally just with respect to their capitals and, moreover, there is not that throng and overflow of our countrymen here as there at Stockholm. When you were as kind as to come to see, besides, you know the English like to live well and are richer and more generous and sociable than are the people of other countries, you cannot have forgot John [Ascham’s] very pleasant [dinners].
You tell me that it is your intention to pay me the money you owe me. This piece of information is highly acceptable to me and hope and trust you will keep your word, for I will tell you politely and sincerely once and for all, that if you expect any future favours from me towards yourself or your family, you must be exact and punctual in all money transactions. I will not suffer my relatives to be a dead weight upon me.
You remember no doubt, Mr Ross, one of His Majesty’s messengers who treated you with a bowl of punch the night you left Stockholm. Poor man, he died lately after only a few hours [of] illness. The doctors could not make out what his complaint was. He was not much on the wrong side of fifty.
I shall be glad to hear that this finds you and yours well and comfortable. You should write to me oftener than you do since postage costs you nothing. Why will not Matthew give me a line now and then. I wish he would, if it was only to assure me that he bears the same good will towards me as he did in 1771 and 1772 when we were at Mycliffe and Wakefield together.
Dear Thomas, farewell, and believe me, to remain your real friend and affectionate kinsman.
This Saturday, 20 May 2017, marks the 374th anniversary of the 1643 Battle of Wakefield. This Battle should not be confused with the far more famous and historically significant battle that took place during the Wars of the Roses in 1460. Our battle took place during the first year of fighting in the near decade long struggle between Cavaliers and Roundheads that was the English Civil War.
This conflict between King and Parliament was important in the development of our modern institutions of parliamentary democracy and in many ways the system of government that emerged in the United States. It is gratifying that my home city of Wakefield was involved in these momentous and world changing events. It is also interesting that there was a unique Wakefield twist to what happened at the time battle was joined.
Since the Middle Ages Wakefield has been known as the “Merrie City” and has had a reputation as a place where people can have a good time. Westgate is still known as a place where people go out drinking on Friday and Saturday nights. It is ironic that ‘revelry’, although this time outside the environs of the centre itself, was the cause of the Royalist defeat.
An informative article (1) about the battle can be found at BritishBattles.com. I paraphrase the key information from the article as follows:
On the eve of battle, the officers were at nearby Heath Hall next to today’s Heath Common. The royalist officers were playing on the bowling green there and to put it in modern parlance ‘getting hammered’. By time of the Parliamentarian attack the royalist officers were seriously worse for ware leaving the rank and file effectively leaderless. It is quite possible that the party at Heath Hall may have been a deliberate ruse on the part of the Hall’s Dame Mary Bolles to allow Wakefield to be easily taken by the parliamentary forces.
The article notes that Parliamentary forces attacked from the north focussing their efforts on Northgate and Warrengate that those familiar with the modern city will know well.
(1) The surprise attack on the town of Wakefield in West Yorkshire by Sir Thomas Fairfax on 20th May 1643 http://www.britishbattles.com/battle-of-wakefield/
Other articles about the battle:
The following are letters sent to my ancestor from her aunt who migrated from Wakefield in England to St Louis in America. There is also a letter and some postcards from her American cousin. In the section below showing the postcards I have tried to link to modern pictures of them to create a sense of historical perspective (click the corresponding links to see). The descriptions that accompany the postcards were written by Elizabeth Kershaw in 1909 and were on the postcards that accompanied the letter dated 23rd July 1909 and were referred to in that letter.
Edward KershawHerbert Richard Kershaw
LETTERS FROM ST LOUIS, MO, USA
1307 S Compton Avenue, St Louis, MO, USA.
23 November 1908
My dear niece
I received your welcome letter and was glad you are better; I have been very sick but I am glad to say I am well for an old woman, as I cannot expect to be very well at my age and in my seventy seventh year. I did write [to] you and got no reply to it and in 4 mo9nths time I got word that Mr Cole was dead but who got the letter I do not know and I am glad to hear from you. We will try to send you some pictures of the 3 girls next time we write to you. They go to high school and they have so many lessons to get a night and then they have to practice the piano lessons so that they do not have much time for anything else but they will have a week holiday at Christmas and then they will have their photos taken and I will send them to you.
How many sisters and brothers have you, give my love to them as I often think of all in Wakefield and wish I could see all of you but I do not expect to see you this [side] of the grave but hope to meet you all in the beyond and the meeting will be a grand reunion for all will be there to meet us.
I will close with love to all of you and God bless you all and hope to hear from you seen.
I remain your ever loving aunt.
Mrs R Kershaw
29 January 1909
My dear niece
I hope you will excuse me for not writing sooner but I hope you are well as I am for my age. I do not expect to write many more letters but will as long as I can. I send you the 3 girls’ photos and the boy but Elizabeth’s is not good of her for it doesn’t do her half justice for she is much better looking but will send a better [one] when she gets some more taken and would very much like you to write to Elizabeth and she will write to you in return so then you can keep in the way of knowing about us all the time all joins me in love to you and all your brothers and sisters not forgetting yourself.
I remain your ever loving aunt and God bless you.
Mrs R Kershaw
April 20th 1909
My dear niece
I received yours sometime since but have neglected to write but please excuse me as I am old and it is a trouble to write so do not think hard of me if I do not answer you just at the time. I should but will as soon as I can. Elizabeth is the oldest and Ruth the second and Edna is the third and Elmer is the boy and youngest. Elizabeth got your letter but she is looking for some posties for you and she will write you soon and send you the posties at the same time. She cannot write as soon as she would for she has so many lessons to get and her practising on the piano for an hour so you will see she does not get much time but in June they get a vacation for 10 weeks and they you may get a long letter for she does write very long ones but the one she [writes to] you in a few days may be short but make it up later. All is well at present and hope you are well. I will close for time hoping to hear from you soon. Give my love to your brother that is 20 I wish I had his photo and yours. I should be very glad all here joins me in love to you and God bless you is my prayer.
I remain your ever loving aunt.
Mrs R Kershaw
I will be 77 on the 17th June so you see I am old.
1338 Maine Street, Racine, Wisconsin.
July 21st 1909
My dear niece
I received your welcome letter and I send you some photo[s] these are old but they’re what I have so I send you them. Fred is called after your mother McNeledge so I though you would like to have them. Edward is the one I make my home with in St Louis and I hope you will write to them in St Louis. My son here would very much like some postals on Wakefield. He was 8 years old when we left there. I am here on a visit for 3 or 4 months, but I will be in St Louis by Christmas all being well. I am between 300-400 miles from home. I am well and hope you are well. All joins me in love to you and if I can get any cards I will send them to you but being old I cannot get round as I would like. I am in my 78[th] year and not so sprite.
I remain your loving aunt.
Mrs R Kershaw
1307 A S Compton Avenue, St Louis, MO.
23rd July 1909
I will now take time to answer your very welcome letter and thank you ever so much for the beautiful views from England. I guess it is never as warm in England as over in America. Sometimes the heat is so intense that we do not know where to put ourselves but at other times it is very cool and pleasant. Grandma is gone a week today. She has gone to Racine, Wisconsin to visit her son Fred [Fred McNeiledge Kershaw???]. I am going to a picnic Sunday, on the 31st and then again on 14th of August. I am getting so tiered of picnics, I have gone to 6 since the last week of school and then to so many other entertainments that I am tired of vacation besides picnics. This is my last year at high school. I hope to be a graduate in June if I pass in all my studies. I am sending some views of St Louis which I hope will please you as much as your English postals please us Americans. It seems so nice to be able to correspond with someone living across the ocean. I guess I will have to close now as I have to help cook supper because papa works nights. Mamma and papa sisters and brothers send love and best wishes from your ever loving cousin.
31st October 1909
My dear niece
I received your ever welcome letter and was glad you are going to be married and I hope you will get a good husband for if he is good it will be a blessing but if on the other hand I will be very sorry. I wish you all the happiness in the world can give you I only wish I could see you but I cannot so my love to you and your intended husband with best wishes and I hope God will bless you in the undertaking. All is well here for they are getting ready for a mascarade ball on the 24th of November. The 3 girls and the mother will go to watch over them. I hope they may have a good time.
I do not know what is the matter with Mrs Southwell as I have not had a word from her since last winter is she sick or what is it. I am back home again and will stop home now. I will write more next time so I will close with love to you.
I remain your ever loving aunt.
Mrs R Kershaw
POSTCARDS ‘SOME VIEWS OF ST LOUIS’ THAT WERE MENTIONED IN ONE OF THE LETTERS ABOVE:
The drive-ways in this part are very nice but this is extremely pretty [??] this park was where we had the World’s Fair and that time we certainly had enough people in St. Louis during the whole of the Fair. (These postcards are from Elizabeth Kershaw. Although my name is Elizabeth I am called Libbie for short).
This is our City Hall, it is very handsome old building but could be in a better locality. Its grounds are beautiful always so pretty and green.
We get our water from this tower, it is in a park which is about 8 blocks from our home. In this park we spend much time in summer and have often climbed to the top of the tower whre we could get a birds eye view of the city.
This building is one of our most useful buildings in the city. It is very large but it is not so extremely beautiful. But we are having a new post office built right across from Union Station.
This is a very interesting place as well as beautiful. Hundreds of people stand on this bridge to view our big floods. This bridge has very large traffic.
This is an interesting cabin to the St. Louisiana. This used to be the home of one of our presidents in earlier days.
This is not a large park but for all is very beautiful. The lake is grand and a pleasure to sit by during summer and fine for skating in winter.
McKinley High School, St. Louis, Mo.
This high school is the one that Ruth and I attend. I have been going 3 years this June, only one year more and Ruth has been going 2½ years this June. We have lots of fun at school and cause the [?teachers?] lots of trouble.
Museum of Fine Arts, St. Louis, Mo.
This has the [?name?] of having a grand front. It contains many beautiful pieces of statuary besides the wonderful paintings and other art works.
This is our new Coliseum, a very pretty building. I was there to [?hear?] [?Gyspey?] Smith. He was fine. They had to hurry this building last fall to hold the [?different?] conventions here. In this building we are going to have a large May Festival in May for three days. I expect to take part in the High School [?chorus?].
Pagoda, Forest Park, St. Louis, Mo.
This is one of the prettiest scenes in St. Louis, and is located in the park where the World’s Fair was held in 1904.
4058 – Smith Academy and Manual Training School, St. Louis, Mo.
This is a school for boys and is situated in a beautiful part of our city. They have fine times at this place.
Soldan High School, St. Louis, Mo.
This one is the new school and was named after the late superintendent of the public schools Mr Soldan. This is not yet finished and will be a handsome school, being ready for work the beginning of September
St. Lukes Hospital, St. Louis, Mo.
This is a very pretty place. Grandma Kershaw has visited there when my aunt [?Jennies?] mother was taken there when she was very ill.
Union Station, St. Louis, Mo.
This good old depot to proud of. It is the largest in the country. It interest many tourists besides its own people.
Vandeventer Place, St. Louis, Mo.
This is where many of St. Louis’ wealthy citizens reside. It certainly is pretty, especially so during the summer months.
Washington University, St. Louis, Mo.
After I am through High School and care to go to college this is the one that I will attend. It is a very large place and interesting. From Elizabeth Kershaw.
Yeatman High School, St. Louis, Mo.
This is one of the four High Schools in St. Louis. It is the second to being the newest. It is built on the same plan as McKinley but this school has more grounds than McKinley and the trees are older.
‘These are not the droids you are looking for’ – Imperial Stormtroopers spotted outside Debenhams.
Of course the above line is from Star Wars Episode IV – A New Hope when Luke Skywalker and Obi-Wan Kenobi are talking their way past an imperial checkpoint at Mos Eisley Spaceport on Tatooine. However, instead of that ‘wretched hive of scum and villainy’ (another line from the film) they were outside Debenhams in Trinity Walk, Wakefield. Judging by the presence of the person with the green buckets nearby it seems that rather than looking for the Death Start plans this time they were helping to raise money for charity. So good of the Imperial Starfleet to send personnel the assist in such a mission. The Empire cannot be all that bad!
UPDATE: Looked on Twitter and it seems that they were collecting for Wakefield Hospice – a very worthy cause. And TrinityWalk has it on its website – shows how much I have kept up with current events in Wakefield this week!
Written on 5 December 2013
Damage from last night’s storm in the UK. A branch from an old horse chestnut tree in the village of Walton, near Wakefield crashes into a car on Shay Lane. I spoke to one of the chaps trying to clear up the mess – apparently the tree has a tree preservation order on it. It would appear that Mother Nature thinks otherwise!
Written on 10 November 2013
Today I went for a walk around Pontefract Castle and since it was a nice day took a few photos which I post below. Wikipedia identifies the following historical anecdotes about the castle:
- King Richard II was supposedly murdered there, a crime immortalised in Shakespeare’s Richard III.
- Henry VIII fifth wife, Catherine Howard is said to have committed the act of adultery at the castle for which she was later executed.
- Mary Queen of Scots stayed there in 1569
- It was a Royalist stronghold during the English Civil War and it was then that it was reduced to ruins
Written on 17 October 2013
I am quite a keen photographer, the following are some photographs that I took a few years ago in my local area. The fields are different every year according to what crop is grown, etc. The particular year when these photographs were taken seemed to cause poppies to grow. I have not seen anything similar either before or since. I thought I would take this opportunity to showcase these vividly colourful photographs on my blog.
Above: 3 bananas on a yellow background. 19 February 2007. Originally posted to Flickr as . Uploaded using F2ComButton. Author Rick Harris. Republished under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license. Modifications: File size changed from 1563 x 1321 px to 640 x 541 px. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana#/media/File:3_Bananas.jpg Licence: Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-SA 2.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en
The Yanks, a curious group, when they’re not dropping bombs on our lads in the Gulf (friendly fire, etc.) they’re starting a trade war with us!
Well, what are allies for, if you can’t piss them off what can you do with you time[?]
In late 1998, as our bombers were being deployed to back up our American cousins in their quarrel with Saddam, a far more serious and heinous plot was being hatched against the Euro-banana.
What I call the Euro banana, is the fruit produced in former British and French colonies, which is distinguished from its American multinational-produced counterpart by its size, it’s a bit smaller (well, size isn’t everything!).
The problem of course, as with many Euro-American disputes, is that we give a trade preference to bananas produced in countries with wish we have historical links and responsibilities.
Naturally the greedy American companies which produced those bendy yellow pieces of fruit, are a bit upset that they can’t monopolise yet another market, that of the EU.
Oh, what a shame how will the American economy ever survive[!]
We have strong cultural and economic links with our former colonies (America included), and some are very poor countries.
When will the US come to realise that some countries take their international responsibilities seriously?
Sometimes we put historical commitment before stuffing our pockets full of cash and claiming to be the most moral and the most correct country in the world.
How many countries does the United States want to offend with its overbearing economic presence, its swaggering attitude, and its imposition of sanctions on countries [whose] leaders or policies it does not like[?]
Well, what do you expect, history has ended, Uncle Sam’s the only remaining superpower, and everyone else has to tow the line.
As Europe moves towards political unification, we might be able to actually have a truly independent foreign policy, a policy that allows a more benign social market capitalism to assert itself on the American version.
Perhaps the real reason behind the dispute is that Europe’s social market capitalism, with its welfare states and social safety nets, is too much of a diversion from the true faith that produces the deprivation and social malaise that is apparent in the US.
At a time when Europe is asserting its independence with a new currency that is a threat to the pre-eminance of the Dollar, the Americans have to come to terms with their decline. The American Century is all but over, and they are beginning to worry about what the future holds. American leaders may ultimately come to realise that the American way may not necessarily be the ultimate destiny of humanity, and that alternatives do in fact exist. The future is a very uncertain place indeed, and as America’s power wanes it will needs its European friends more than ever.
If America continues its aggressive economic posturing, Europe and America could suffer a banana split with serious implications for both. AMERICA BE WARNED!
By Chris Knowles
Originally published in the REaction! the political magazine of Wakefield District Young Labour, ISSN 1464-8105, Vol.2 no.1 April 1999.